![]() ![]() This prostitution happens at ALL Jester functions that are not co-ed (which are few, mainly the Christmas parties where we shower our wives with extravagant gifts). You are certainly doing a dignified justice. But the core issue of my investigation has been non profit transparency, disclosure and accountability, things that both the Shriners and Jesters seem to avoid at any cost. The IRS needs to step in here, suspend their non profit status and demand each court to or subpoena each court (the Jesters’ clubs are called courts) for their “audited” financial statements because they will see that the statements do not resemble their tax returns. One group spent about $72,000 on their weekend bash called the Book of the Play. The headlines might be hollering about the judge and prostitutes, in this and other cases, but the real problem is that the Jesters have manipulated the non profit system so they can donate money, deduct it from their taxes and go on Jester paid trips. Yes, the Masonic system of justice is one these guys do not want to face, but now that the FBI is involved and possibly the IRS, there will be no way out.Īfter my Jesters articles, detractors came out of the woodwork to try and discredit me but failed to refute the data and information that I presented. The Jesters seems to be nothing more than a party group that somehow was given non profit status by the IRS. Yes, all these guys are Masons but the closer relationship is between the Shriners and the Jesters, as one must be invited as a Shrine leader to become a Jester.Ībout the tax returns? If you go to and type in “Jesters” you can see their tax returns. ![]() I have also been waiting for something pre-emptive but these guys instead go for the “head in the sand” approach. There is a pattern of those members who are also sworn to uphold the law but instead turn a blind eye to crime to protect the brotherhood. I think the biggest problem is 1) the Shriners and Jesters are non profit groups and these stories are part of uncovering the biggest non profit fraud in history and 2) the Shriners believe that their law is above the law of the land. I have been investigating the Shriners for two years and have been covering not only the Buffalo Jesters story, but the story about how 19 Jesters were called to testify as witnesses about their first hand knowledge of illegal drugs and prostitution after a fishing trip to Brazil. So I can’t help but wonder, do we need to question judges on whether they are Masons, and where their loyalty stands?Ħ thoughts on “ Comments From the Jesters Raise a Question” To have a bunch of judges in there would hardly seem a stretch. The Masons are a secret society, and reportedly have had such distinguished members as George Washington and Teddy Roosevelt. How hard would it be for a defendant to give a judge the secret Mason wink, or work the word “hallibut” into his not-guilty plea? Are Masonic judges conflicted? Is there really a secret Masonic star-chamber that does worse things than our courts? Is this just a silly reaction to a few overzealous Masons who take their club a little too seriously, or is there a real concern that some judges may feel a stronger allegiance to their brotherhood than to their responsibility to the law? I’m beginning to wonder in earnest. There is a secrecy, and a zeal, that came through some of the reactions to this Jester revelation that leads me to think that a fear that judges who are also Masons might not be so crazy. What if we found that judges who are Masons are torn in their responsibility? Would a judge/Mason cut a fellow Mason a break? Would he decide that Mason justice, rather than criminal justice, was the appropriate way to deal with his lodge brother? I wondered, was his allegiance as a judge to the Constitution and the laws of the State of New York, or to the Masons? ![]() The issue arose from a retired upstate New York judge who was a member of the Jesters, an offshoot of the Masons, who happened to be a “whoremongerer” on the side. But then he adds that it is “far worse then what any court can do” made me think. I don’t know what that is, and I don’t know what constitutes misconduct to a Mason. The Mason’s have their own, internal way of dealing with misconduct. This notion raised a specter that had not previously occurred to me. Which we as masons know is far worse then what any court can do to us. I did not however join to drink and swear and party and go on sex tours and become a whoremonger and an adulterer, and if i know a brother that is so doing then i will personally bring him up on mansonic charges. Meyer (that, I believe, is his Mason handle, and I respect his choice of presenting himself that way) wrote: One commenter raised a red flag that has bothered me since. Recent posts about the Royal Order Jesters have brought out an unusual array of comments. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |